You are going to block this site. This will do the following:
- You will no longer see this site in searches.
- Site will no longer see your site in searches.
- Site will not be able to comment on your site profile.
- Any comments this site has posted to your profile will not be displayed.
Are you sure you want to do this?
As usual, he reads like most boomercons: superficial, banal analysis of symptoms with scant address of causation, always whining in pessimistically comparative retrospect without any pragmatic outlook. Dalrymple, Buchanan, Theodoracopoulos and David Cole delve into these subjects with far more perspicacity.
True! The appeal to reader's bitter emotions is strong in this one, in-depth politico-historical revelations -- not so much. I guess it worked for me at the moment I encountered it. I must admit I have a taste for a good boomer whine. In fact, if I learned anything from the enemy, it's that I can be anyone I am not. So I became a boomerkin. And thanks for telling me about Dalrymple!
Three quarters of millennials are wretched boomerists -- hideous! From any given article, I expect to be apprised and challenged, if not inspired. As social media's proven exhaustively, anyone can merely bemoan what's left of this heinous culture...
Most conservatives are a backwards shambles, not the least because so few of them explore means by which soft tyranny and sociocultural declension may be circumvented or curbed in online or communal microcosms.
Dalrymple's a truly eximious essayist, probably the best living succedaneum for Emerson, Chesterton, Burgess, et al. In particular, his dyslogies on conditions of mass pathology and modern architecture (esp. brutalism) are almost essential reading.