You are going to block this site. This will do the following:
- You will no longer see this site in searches.
- Site will no longer see your site in searches.
- Site will not be able to comment on your site profile.
- Any comments this site has posted to your profile will not be displayed.
Are you sure you want to do this?
Yes, he did: he resigned from two institutions he's enriched almost immeasurably in response to unequivocal calumny. If he'd fought these lying, leftist, celibate swine to the teeth by challenging them to adduce this nonexistent defense of Epstein to which they've mendaciously alluded, and charging in all verity that this is libel, he'd still be employed...
...and they wouldn't be tweeting fatuous, insufferably self-congratulatory posts in which they sophisticate his arguments as defamatory fabrications to compensate for their patent deficiencies.
Yes, you're right in that sense. I recently read a comment online that expressed frustration over most computer guys/nerds/geeks being too soft for their own good, which allows these sorts of screeching leftists to scare them, shun them, and slowly take over the field. The real loss falls on MIT and the FSF.
Another common error among nerds and fellow geeks is that too many of them are stuck in the '90s, and imagine that these are fellow social outcasts. They aren't.
Finally, Stallman should employ the more effective and gramatically elegant, "accusatory inflation" or "accusatory hyperbole" rather than the clunkily substantive, "accusation inflation," but now I'm just quibbling.