With regards to the content from digdeeper: Yes, they're very biased and opinionated. I don't believe that all of their viewpoints are entirely unfounded though, even if not always the most logically pragmatic solutions to achieve their own goals/ideals. I don't see their content as useless though. It's obvious they're definitely filling some type of desired niche. Where critical thinking by the reader is required.
If there are sites here which seem to undoubtedly promote self-harm then *please* do contact administration about it with as much relevant information that you can provide.
Contacted Neocities about the self-harm website, though I'm not sure if they would do anything about it. About the digdepper thing, what strikes me as most absurd is the people who blindly follow everything he says. You can read it as much as you want, but do your own research too, don't just stick to one person (very flawed) account.
THANK u! actually i say this as i update my gallery page... so soon you will see more