i can't believe i have to address this but oh my fucking god people are using shit from THE OLD OWNER OF MY DOMAIN FROM 2003 as a basis of accusing me of running a jailbait webring
8 likes
Delete
Are you sure you want to remove this comment from the news feed?
sorry i called you farmers out for being awful people but this confirms you're not interested in helping victims of exploitative material and merely "getting back at me for calling you out. and you fucking knew it because wayback machine states when a site was archived, and YOU all acknowledged my age without considering how old i'd be in 2003. this was baseless and clearly meant to defame me
pic of how the page doesn't load on my domain (because i never uploaded that to my server and wayback machine auto redirected to my index): https://i.imgur.com/cTPwB23.png
not same people who said i'm too stupid for college not knowing how time, domain registration, and accessing publicly available info works. i recommend getting out of web dev if you don't know how the latter two work
idk how to explain how sometimes, if wayback machine doesn't have info, it'll fill it in with what is currently available. apparently someone griped part of my layout wasn't visible in one of the shots and i've bee using the same layout for 20 years. so here's a cap of, yes, my index displaying under content that clearly doesn't match it. bc it's clearly an iframe. https://i.imgur.com/MZhXAjM.png
my assumption is they plopped my index into the iframe bc they didn't have the iframe's original content. also custom fonts weren't a thing in 2003. congrats, you've successfully proven you don't know how wayback machine, iframes, or web dev from the time period works
i deleted a particular comment bc while on my end it's context to why this accusation was so gross, i don't think it's necessarily something everyone would care to see on their tl. i'm posting this for posterity on that. that said, this subject's closed on my end
in 2003, when the wayback machine states the page was accessed, i was TWELVE YEARS OLD. i couldn't legally own a domain in my name
sorry i called you farmers out for being awful people but this confirms you're not interested in helping victims of exploitative material and merely "getting back at me for calling you out. and you fucking knew it because wayback machine states when a site was archived, and YOU all acknowledged my age without considering how old i'd be in 2003. this was baseless and clearly meant to defame me
pic of wayback machine showing the date: https://i.imgur.com/uFF1MNg.png
pic of how the page doesn't load on my domain (because i never uploaded that to my server and wayback machine auto redirected to my index): https://i.imgur.com/cTPwB23.png
icann whois lookup: https://i.imgur.com/XZzD6Az.png
my portal page with who i renew the domain with with the same registration date: https://i.imgur.com/0GUKsNP.png
not same people who said i'm too stupid for college not knowing how time, domain registration, and accessing publicly available info works. i recommend getting out of web dev if you don't know how the latter two work
idk how to explain how sometimes, if wayback machine doesn't have info, it'll fill it in with what is currently available. apparently someone griped part of my layout wasn't visible in one of the shots and i've bee using the same layout for 20 years. so here's a cap of, yes, my index displaying under content that clearly doesn't match it. bc it's clearly an iframe. https://i.imgur.com/MZhXAjM.png
my assumption is they plopped my index into the iframe bc they didn't have the iframe's original content. also custom fonts weren't a thing in 2003. congrats, you've successfully proven you don't know how wayback machine, iframes, or web dev from the time period works
i deleted a particular comment bc while on my end it's context to why this accusation was so gross, i don't think it's necessarily something everyone would care to see on their tl. i'm posting this for posterity on that. that said, this subject's closed on my end