You are going to block this site. This will do the following:
- You will no longer see this site in searches.
- Site will no longer see your site in searches.
- Site will not be able to comment on your site profile.
- Any comments this site has posted to your profile will not be displayed.
Are you sure you want to do this?
Interesting take on the issue of continents - though I'd fight you on the placement of Antarctica >:3
Good article about the continents, but the moment you make concessions based on social/political quirks is the moment we're back to 37 continents.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts behind *why* exactly these continents are better. To be fair, both this and the standard continent layout are arbitrary as each other, and teckhnikually *puts on pretentious face* the proper one is whatever geologists use.
Oh, i think the current seven/six-continent model is perfectly serviceable, i just thought saying there are two continents would rile people up — it's the logical conclusion of the arguments about "what about Eurasia‽" and "but in South America they say America is one continent!!"
I think it would be better to call the two "supercontinents", in the same way that India and Europe are "subcontinents"
ALSO geologists can suck it, "Nazca" is not a continent
It's time to cancel Marijn on GeologyHub